Saturday, October 26, 2019
An Inspector Calls by J.B. Priestley Essay -- Papers
 An Inspector Calls by J.B. Priestley         In Priestley's play An Inspector Calls, the two main characters,     Arthur Birling and the Inspector, both show certain features of real     people but, in particular the Inspector seems to be representative of     political and social issues that were relevant in 1912. What seems     like a simple detective thriller, with an inspector asking questions     and the other characters answering them in order to find the person     responsible for the suicide of Eva Smith (alias Daisy Renton),     gradually develops into a complex investigation of political stances,     of capitalism and socialism.       To answer this question fully, we have to consider many different     aspects of Mr Birling and the Inspector's characters. We need to look     at the views they express, but we also need to look at their     interaction with other characters before we can fully decide whether     they have a rounded personality and can thus be considered to be real     people or whether they merely represent social and political concepts.     We also need to consider the time the play was set in, the events, the     setting and the ritual associated with it.       In An Inspector Calls many different issues are brought up about     social attitudes and political views, but the most important has to be     responsibility. In this particular context, Birling and the Inspector     clearly have to be seen as representatives of two opposing definitions     of responsibility. While Birling sees it as "a man has to make his own     way, has to look after himself and his family", thus excluding     responsibility for anybody else, the Inspector represents the idea of     social responsibility in a society where t...              ...a Smith to     commit suicide. The Inspector never forgives nor punishes but just     tries to warn the Birlings of their doings so that they can say the     right things to the real Inspector, and to know what they have all     done.       I believe that Priestley has meant to not go into detail on the     Inspectors feelings and beliefs, as this almost adds a sought of     mystery around the Inspectors character, it mainly gets you thinking     towards the end, is the Inspector real or are the Birlings just     hallucinating, or could the Inspector be a ghost or a Goole which his     last name could represent (Inspector Goole). But the question was can     the Inspector represent a real person, to a certain extent yes, but     not as fully as Mr Birlings character can, so in my opinion he is not     a very good representative of real people in the era of the play.                        
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.